Legal advantage and disadvantage if you plan to stay separatly in failed marriage?

Response –

 

No law can force someone to stay with other person except giving maintenance.

However, if peeved she can file frivolous cases and then the same would be a lengthy court battle.

Better to resolve the disputes amicably.
 

It’s best to seek Judicial Seperation in such a matter. What Judicial Seperation would do is it makes cohabitation non compulsory. It is granted on the same grounds as divorce i.e cruelty, adultery etc. Its best to go in for in cases like we have here, were a party hates living together as much as the thought of divorce. It would give you plenty time to bounce back or part away. The best part about this is – if it remains in force for a year i.e you stay away for a year, and then you want to get out the union. The divorce path is also made a lot easier.

What is legally stated as sum total answer under this second question is termed as “separation” and by such charges one can yes get ‘seperation’ decree from court but why go to that level as mere ‘seperation’ the bonds of marriage does not get dissolved for any future activities so sum total balance your day-today needs and supply accordingly as you are one who is suffering and with such short briefs it becomes difficult to expressly point to one direction as ‘gurumantra” on what to do and what laws says exclusively about such activities as stated in your opening brief on reason to shift shared household yet keeping ties with parents. It all boils down to careful adjustments and giving space by spouses.