When arguing that the opposing side's case constitutes an abuse of process during a deposition or hearing, strategically focus on establishing three key elements: their willful misuse of court procedures, a clear ulterior motive unrelated to legal redress, and the resulting prejudice. Methodically present evidence—such as subpoenas seeking irrelevant information, contradictory pleadings, or communications demonstrating intent to harass or delay—to show the litigation is a weaponized tool for collateral gain. Frame objections and questioning to highlight how their actions pervert the court’s purpose, while maintaining a calm, professional demeanor that contrasts with their alleged misconduct. Conclude by articulating how sanctions or dismissal directly align with the court’s duty to protect its integrity from such tactics.****
