When dealing with forum non conveniens in cases involving multiple jurisdictions, lawyers follow a strategic and analytical approach to ensure the most appropriate forum is chosen for justice and convenience. They begin by assessing the factual and legal connections of the dispute to each jurisdiction, including where the parties reside, where the cause of action arose, and where evidence is located. Lawyers then evaluate the adequacy of alternative forums, considering fairness, access to remedies, and procedural efficiency. The best practice involves balancing private and public interest factors—such as witness convenience, cost, and local interest—while preparing strong factual support through affidavits and documentation. Coordination with local counsel in other jurisdictions and careful attention to jurisdiction clauses, limitation periods, and enforcement prospects are also crucial. Ultimately, effective management of forum non conveniens relies on early evaluation, detailed preparation, and a clear demonstration that the chosen forum best serves the ends of justice.
