The best lawyers approach cases dismissed due to forum non conveniens by focusing on both the legal adequacy of the alternative forum and the fairness of the dismissal itself. They argue that the chosen forum is the most appropriate venue by demonstrating strong connections such as residence, location of evidence, and accessibility of witnesses. These lawyers also highlight any limitations or injustices the plaintiff may face if the case is moved elsewhere, such as lack of remedy or procedural disadvantages. To make their arguments effective, they support claims with detailed affidavits, factual documentation, and expert opinions while appealing to the court’s sense of fairness and public interest. Ultimately, their strategy centers on reframing the issue from one of mere convenience to one of ensuring equal access to justice.
