To strengthen their argument when forum non conveniens is raised, a lawyer should emphasize the strong connections of the case to the chosen forum, including the plaintiff’s residence, location of evidence, and the forum’s public interest in the dispute. The lawyer should argue that the plaintiff's choice of forum should be given significant weight and challenge the adequacy of the alternative forum, highlighting any legal or procedural limitations that would hinder the plaintiff's ability to access justice. Additionally, the lawyer can argue that retaining jurisdiction will serve judicial economy by preventing duplicative litigation and unnecessary delays. By focusing on these factors—especially the fairness and practicality of the forum—the lawyer can effectively persuade the court to deny the motion and retain jurisdiction.
