Judges evaluate several key factors when deciding on a forum non conveniens motion, including the convenience of the parties and witnesses, the location of evidence, and the relative ease of access to justice in the proposed forum. They also consider public interest factors such as the local interest in the dispute, the burden on the court system, and the appropriateness of the forum for enforcing any judgment. In cross-border cases, these factors are particularly significant as courts assess the practicality and fairness of litigating in a foreign jurisdiction, weighing whether an alternative forum offers a fair and effective remedy or would impose significant barriers to justice. The outcome of cross-border cases often hinges on which forum offers the best balance of convenience, fairness, and legal effectiveness, ensuring that litigation is both efficient and just for all parties involved.
