Conflicts in parallel proceedings often arise due to overlapping jurisdictions, inconsistent legal strategies, and the simultaneous handling of similar issues in multiple forums, leading to contradictory judgments and procedural inefficiencies. These conflicts are typically caused by poor coordination between legal teams, lack of jurisdictional clarity, and differing procedural timelines or evidentiary rules. To avoid such complications, lawyers should begin with a thorough assessment of all ongoing and potential proceedings to identify areas of overlap and risk. Establishing a unified legal strategy, appointing a lead counsel for coordination, and ensuring consistent pleadings and evidence across jurisdictions are essential steps. Best practices also include maintaining transparent communication among all involved lawyers, seeking procedural remedies such as case consolidation or stays, and documenting every action to ensure alignment. By following this structured, step-by-step approach, legal teams can prevent duplication, reduce the likelihood of conflicting rulings, and protect their client’s interests efficiently and lawfully.
