Splitting of causes of action becomes a legal issue when a party files multiple suits based on the same set of facts or transaction but seeks different remedies in each, thereby burdening the judicial system and risking inconsistent judgments. Courts typically challenge such actions when it appears the plaintiff is trying to relitigate matters that could have been included in an earlier suit, invoking principles like res judicata or abuse of process. Best lawyers identify this issue early by conducting a comprehensive review of all transactions and grievances before filing, mapping every claim and relief to ensure they stem from distinct causes, if any. They also analyze previous pleadings, correspondence, and evidence to detect overlaps, and where duplication is found, they advise clients to consolidate or amend the existing pleadings — preventing procedural objections, saving time, and preserving the client’s right to full and fair adjudication.
