Courts most often dismiss cases for “no cause of action” when the plaint fails to set out the essential facts showing a legal right, a wrongful act by the defendant, and the link between the two. Common reasons include vague or generalized allegations, omission of key dates or events, lack of supporting documents, improper valuation or jurisdiction, or reliance on assumptions instead of material facts. Sometimes, plaintiffs also weaken their case by copying template pleadings without tailoring them to their specific dispute. To avoid this outcome, clients should work closely with a competent lawyer who conducts a pre-filing case audit, ensuring that every element of the cause of action—such as duty, breach, causation, and damage—is clearly stated and factually supported. Lawyers should draft pleadings with precision, attach relevant evidence, and include a concise paragraph summarizing how and when the right to sue arose. They also review the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC standards before filing, anticipate objections, and prepare to justify each averment in court. With thorough preparation, factual clarity, and expert legal guidance, plaintiffs can prevent dismissal and ensure their case proceeds on strong legal footing.
