Tag: Allahabad-High-Court

CBI books sitting Allahabad high court judge SN Shukla in bribery case.

Source – hindustantimes.com The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a case against sitting Allahabad high court judge Justice Shri Narayan Shukla alleging that he accepted bribe in lieu of giving a favourable order for a Lucknow-based medical college. Prasad Institute of Medical Sciences was disbarred from taking admissions by the government in May

CBI Books Allahabad High Court Judge in a Medical College Corruption Case, Searches Residence.

Source – news18.com New Delhi: The CBI has booked Allahabad High Court judge Justice SN Shukla in a corruption case for allegedly favouring a medical college and carried out searches at his Lucknow residence, officials said on Friday. Along with Justice Shri Narain Shukla of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court, the agency has

Craft reform programme for troublesome students: Allahabad HC to AMU, BHU.

Source – indiatoday.in The Allahabad High Court has directed Banaras Hindu University and Aligarh Muslim University to come up with a reform and rehabilitation programme for students facing disciplinary action for misconduct. The court gave out the directions while quashing the BHU’s suspension order last year against Anant Narayan Mishra, a student penalised for allegedly assaulting a

Allahabad High Court Denies Bail to Bulandshahr Mob Violence Accused.

Source – news18.com Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court on Tuesday dismissed the bail application of an accused in last year’s violence in Bulandshahr, where a mob shot dead a police inspector. While dismissing accused Lokendra’s bail plea, Justice Yashwant Varma observed, “The incident shows that the authority of the State itself was challenged and the

The Curious Case of the 1,045-Page Ayodhya Judgment With Its Mystery Author and Dissenting Opinion.

Source – news18.com New Delhi: Apart from the order itself, two features of the judgment delivered by the five-judge bench in the Ayodhya title dispute have stood out. First, it does not specify the name of the judge(s) who authored the judgment. And secondly, the unanimous judgment does not mention the name of the judge who dissented on the issue