Source:-https:\/\/www.thehindu.com<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a man arrested in connection with the north-east Delhi riots in February, noting that the police has not been able to explain why there was a delay of seven days before his name was added in the FIR.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Justice Suresh Kumar Kait said it was not in dispute that the incident took place on February 25, but the statements of two constables who were on duty and saw the incident as well as identified the accused, Kasim, was recorded only on March 3. \u201cThere is no explanation as to why the police officials did not make a PCR call\/DD (daily diary) entry to the concerned police station regarding involvement of petitioner on February 25,\u201d the High Court said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Justice Kait noted that Kasim\u2019s name was added only after a person, allegedly injured in the riots, recorded his statement on March 3 in which he named Kasim. After this, the constables made their statements and also identified the accused.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The HC further noted that as per the chargesheet, 11 videos showed the riots on February 24 and 25 at the crime spot, and at the house of former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain. \u201cIt is also not in dispute that co-accused Mr. Hussain and Liyakat were seen in the CCTV footage, however, petitioner [Kasim] is not seen in any of the 11 videos,\u201d said Justice Kait.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The special public prosecutor had argued that Kasim is a \u2018Bad Character\u2019 of the area and there are 10 cases against him due to which the constables knew Kasim and were able to identify him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The injured person who identified some of the rioters, including Kasim, stated that he was near Mr. Hussain\u2019s house around 4 p.m. on February 25 and saw an angry mob on the terrace pelting stones, firing guns, throwing petrol bombs, and chanting communal slogans. During the violence, the person was allegedly shot in his shoulder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Around 4:00 pm, he came out of his house to purchase some household articles and when he reached near Lakhpat School, Chand Bagh, he found that riots broke out in the whole area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When he reached near Tahir Hussain\u2019s house, he saw angry mob on the terrace of the said house, who were pelting stones, firing gun shots and throwing petrol bombs upon the houses of Hindu community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He said that the mob was chanting anti-communal slogans. Later, one of the boys namely, Gulfam, fired upon him which hit on his right shoulder. He identified the other accused including Tahir Hussain, Shah Alam, Tanveer Malik, Nazeem and Kasim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When the HC asked the police about Kasim\u2019s phone location, the special public prosecutor stated that Kasim\u2019s phone was not in \u2018active mode\u2019 from February 17 to March 23 so phone location could not be done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWithout commenting on the merits of the case and in view of the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner,\u201d the High Court stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The High Court recently granted bail to another man charged with rioting in a Delhi riots case, after noting that there is no CCTV footage, video clip or photo to corroborate the prosecution\u2019s claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Justice Kait ordered that Mohd. Rehman be released on bail, if not required in any other case, on his furnishing a personal bond of \u20b925,000 with one surety of like amount.<\/p>\n