{"id":3359,"date":"2014-07-19T10:47:00","date_gmt":"2014-07-19T10:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/list-of-more-than-100-judgements-where-maintenance-denied-to-wives\/"},"modified":"2014-07-19T10:47:00","modified_gmt":"2014-07-19T10:47:00","slug":"list-of-more-than-100-judgements-where-maintenance-denied-to-wives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/list-of-more-than-100-judgements-where-maintenance-denied-to-wives\/","title":{"rendered":"List of More than 100 Judgements where Maintenance denied to wives.."},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
1.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT  :  Dated 4 Feb 2005<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance not granted as it is proved that wife wants to reside separately. <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
2.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT  : Dated Apr 2008.<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance not granted as it is proved no reason to leave husbands. <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
3.  CHENNAI HIGH COURT  : Dated 21 June 2002<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance Denied<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
4.  CHENNAI HIGH COURT  : Dated 21 Feb 2003<\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance For Working Women<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
5.  MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT : Dated 24 March 2000<\/span><\/div>\n
No Interim\/Maintenance for Capable, Working Women<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
6. DELHI HIGH COURT  : Dated 28 July 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
She was earning and she had not come to the Court with clean hands.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
7. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 22 Feb 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
Wife Troubled -No Maintenance <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
8. SUPREME COURT  : Dated 23 March, 2009 <\/span><\/div>\n
SC Judgement on HMA24 – Wife working no maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
9. HIGH COURT OF P & H <\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance awarded in two sections to be offset<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
10. HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD <\/span><\/div>\n
Old Parents, Maintenance reduced. <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
11. MUMBAI HIGH COURT: Dated 22 February, 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
Perjury in 125 crPc<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
12. MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT: Madhuri Bai vs Minor Surendra Kumar And Anr. on 24 April, 1998 <\/span><\/div>\n
Child can claim maintenance u\/s 125 from mother<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
13. MADRAS HIGH COURT: S.Chandra vs C.V.Sridharan on 21 February 2007<\/span><\/div>\n
Claim alimony within 6 Months of Divorce<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
14. DELHI HIGH COURT: Sanjay Bhardwaj & Ors. vs The State & Anr. on 27 August, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Unemployed man can not be forced to pay Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
15. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Ines Miranda vs Santosh K Swamy dated 14 december 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
TRANSFER PETITION \u2013 Payment to Husband<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
16. MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated  17 July, 1991 <\/span><\/div>\n
Same relief (maintenance)cannot be asked twice in two different courts<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
17. DELHI COURT : METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NEW DELHI <\/span><\/div>\n
Vexatious petition, maintenance,relief is declined<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
18. BOMBAY HIGH COURT :  Dated 14 March 2011<\/span><\/div>\n
Perjury Judgement : Rigorous imprisonment for False Case<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
19. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (CENTRAL)TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI: Dated  15 April 2011<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance claim based on Affidavit dismissed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
20. PUNJAB – HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated  17 February 2011<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance claim based on Affidavit dismissed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
 <\/span><\/div>\n
\n
21. DELHI HIGH COURT <\/span><\/div>\n
Husband Property Not Counted in Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
22.  HIGH COURT OF P & H :  Dated 28 July 1961<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance not based on Arthmetic Calculation<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
23. DELHI HIGH COURT  : Dated 1 September, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Claim of high status of husband not sufficient for interim maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
24.  DELHI HIGH COURT  : Dated 30 August, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Multiple Maintenance petitions are not allowed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
25. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Reduced Intrim Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
26.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  11 June, 1993 <\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
27. MUMBAI HIGH COURT :  Dated  18 July, 2009<\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance to Wife if RCR By Husband Suicceed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
28. MUMBAI HIGH COURT <\/span><\/div>\n
Permanent Alimoney Cancelled.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
29. MUMBAI HIGH COURRT: Dated 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Income Tax and Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
30. MUMBAI HIGH COURRT: Dated 18 November 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Income tax returns cannt decide Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
31. MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT: Dated 29 August 1991<\/span><\/div>\n
Challenging the rejected interim maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
32. PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated 25 January, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
False affidavit, perjury procedure in 24 HMA<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
33. DELHI HIGH COURT  : Dated 7 September 2006<\/span><\/div>\n
Divorce withdrawn \u2013 Maintance to be paid<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
34. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 16 November 2004<\/span><\/div>\n
Father In Law not responsible for Residence<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
35. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: Dated 22 September, 1992 <\/span><\/div>\n
Women to Prove ligitimacy of child for maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
36. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION<\/span><\/div>\n
Bank Account Details and confidentiality<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
37. BOMBAY HIGH COURT: Dated  15 September, 2004 <\/span><\/div>\n
Return of Stridhan,Alimony and Hidding Past<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
38. GAUHATI HIGH COURT: Dated  23 April, 2004 <\/span><\/div>\n
Guardianship within 2 Months<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
39. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  9 March, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Fine for Delaying tactics by Lawyer<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
40. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION <\/span><\/div>\n
Central Information Commission – CIC Order in Passport Details<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n


 
<\/span><\/p>\n

61. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  25 October, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Petitioner must claim she is unable to maintain herself for <\/a><\/span>relief of maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
62. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated  25 March, 1976 <\/span><\/div>\n
Petitioner must claim she is unable to maintain herself for <\/a><\/span>relief of maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
63. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 13 February, 1980 <\/span><\/div>\n
She should prove that she is unable to maintain <\/a><\/span>herself in addition to the facts that <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
her husband has sufficient means<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
to maintain her and that he has neglected to maintain her<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
64. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated  22 August, 2005 <\/span><\/div>\n
No maintenance for earning wife<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
65. DISTRICT COURT , SAKET, DELHI : Dated  18 Nov 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Employable wife not entitled to maintenance.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
66. DISTRICT COURT , SAKET, DELHI : Dated 24 March 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
An NRI wins an interim maintenance case<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
67. FAMILY COURT , HYDERABAD<\/span><\/div>\n
Hyderabad Family court, unclean hands, no maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
68. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated  17 April 2007<\/span><\/div>\n
Conditions when maintenance to be paid<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
69. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  11 January, 2011 <\/span><\/div>\n
All State Amendments in Sec. 125 are invalid<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
70. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 17 February, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus for girl child custody to Father<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
71. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 28 April, 2005 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus dismissed in Custody Appeal<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
72. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  21 November, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Custody to reMarried women<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
73. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 25 January, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus on Custody to Father<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
74. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 6 February, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus for Custody on Death<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
75. KERALA HIGH COURT : Dated  December, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
NBW cannot be issued for non payment of maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
76. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION <\/span><\/div>\n
CIC \u2013 Income Tax Details of FIL are public<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
77. UTTARANCHAl HIGH COURT : Dated  17 March, 2011 <\/span><\/div>\n
HC Quash Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
78. MUMBAI HIGH COURT :Dated  13 September, 1995 <\/span><\/div>\n
No multiple maintenance claims<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
79. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  9 October, 1985 <\/span><\/div>\n
Magistrate can grant interim maintenance ?<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Some More useful Judgements:
<\/span><\/h3>\n
 <\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
81. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  16 February, 2000 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus in Custody<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
82. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated  27 March, 2007 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus in Divorce \/ Custody Petition<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
83.SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  17 October, 1974 <\/span><\/div>\n
Separate income of the wife can be taken into account in determining the amount of maintenance payable to her<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
84. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  31 January, 2003 <\/span><\/div>\n
HMA moveable property can not be termed as Income<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
85. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  18 September, 2008 <\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance On Actual Earnings<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
86. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  30 September, 2008 <\/span><\/div>\n
Parents can kickout their Children<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
87. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  28 March, 2000 <\/span><\/div>\n
Liability of maintenance of children is co-extensive<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
88. GUJRAT HIGH COURT : Dated on 21 October 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
No Multiple maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
89. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  12 October, 2009 <\/span><\/div>\n
DV can be filed anywhere<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
90. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated  28 October, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Magistrate should not blindly call all family members as respondents<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
91. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  4 October, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
DVA only against who are in domestic relationship<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
92. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  20 September, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
How to decide domestic relationship in DVA<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
93. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  8 February, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Frivolous petition claiming damages dismissed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
94. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  7 January, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance, Women fined, Contempt of Court<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
95. ANDHRA HIGH COURT : Dated  15 November, 1995 <\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance to illegitimate Child ?<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
96. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION <\/span><\/div>\n
RTI \u2013 Husband can get Wife PF details<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
97. ANDHRA HIGH COURT : Dated  31 March, 1989 <\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance arrears for 1 year only !<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
98. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  6 December, 2005 <\/span><\/div>\n
Fine for forcibly taking away Child<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
99. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated  28 February, 2007 <\/span><\/div>\n
Family Court Jurisdiction<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
100. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  2 March 2000<\/span><\/div>\n
Wife is not entitled to maintenance who has deserted her husband,<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\n
 <\/div>\n
101. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  03 December 2009<\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance If Wife Lies<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
102. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  28 April 2009<\/span><\/div>\n
Take EMI Into Cosideration in Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
103. HIGH COURT OF STATE OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH : Dated 13 March 2009<\/span><\/div>\n
No alimony to Women who desert her husband<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
104. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 23 February, 2009<\/span><\/div>\n
Interim maint increase illegal as no income proof produced<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
105. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Interim maint amt shuld be based on status of both part<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
106. CHATTISGARAH HIGH COURT : Dated 15 February, 2004<\/span><\/div>\n
No maintenance for a deserting wife<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
107. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT: Dated 22 January, 1999<\/span><\/div>\n
No maintenance for a deserting wife<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
108. BOMBAY HIGH COURT : Dated 26 February, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Interim maintenance cannot be increased based on husband’s salary hike.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
109. GUJARAT HIGH COURT : Dated 9 February, 2011<\/span><\/div>\n
Childrens has to maintain parents.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
110. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July 2011<\/span><\/div>\n
Meaning of unable to maintain <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
111. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 27 November 2007<\/span><\/div>\n
Unable to maintain herself in Maintenance <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
112. DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE DELHI : Dated 28th August 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Landmark Judgement for DV Case<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
113. CHENNAI HIGH COURT : Dated 26th August 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Perjury Case<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
114. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated 19 January, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Wife fined 10,000\/- in Perjury case but Husband fighting for further action!!<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
115. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 18 August, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Every allegations do not justify initiation of prosecution under 340 CRPC<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
116. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 15 March, 2001<\/span><\/div>\n
Petition under CrPC 340 must be decided only at the end<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
117. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated 09 Janurary 2003<\/span><\/div>\n
Perjury application must be decided first before proceeding with the case<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
118. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 14 November, 1994<\/span><\/div>\n
No one should indulge in immoral acts like perjury, prevarication and motivated falsehoods : 2 weeks Jail<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
119. GUJARAT HIGH COURT  : Dated 18 August, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Petitioner aggreed for perjury \u2013 Gujrat HC told to deposit 25K as probable fine<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
120. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 1 December, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
SC judgement in CrPC 340 wrt Chartered Accountants Act<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t