{"id":3406,"date":"2014-06-03T08:30:00","date_gmt":"2014-06-03T08:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/judgements-on-dv-498a-and-divorce\/"},"modified":"2025-02-01T18:10:34","modified_gmt":"2025-02-01T18:10:34","slug":"judgements-on-dv-498a-and-divorce","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/judgements-on-dv-498a-and-divorce\/","title":{"rendered":"JUDGEMENTS on DV, 498a and Divorce"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
1.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT  :  Dated 4 Feb 2005<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance not granted as it is proved that wife wants to reside separately. <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
2.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT  : Dated Apr 2008.<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance not granted as it is proved no reason to leave husbands. <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
3.  CHENNAI HIGH COURT  : Dated 21 June 2002<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance Denied<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
4.  CHENNAI HIGH COURT  : Dated 21 Feb 2003<\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance For Working Women<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
5.  MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT : Dated 24 March 2000<\/span><\/div>\n
No Interim\/Maintenance for Capable, Working Women<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
6. DELHI HIGH COURT  : Dated 28 July 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
She was earning and she had not come to the Court with clean hands.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
7. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 22 Feb 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
Wife Troubled -No Maintenance <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
8. SUPREME COURT  : Dated 23 March, 2009 <\/span><\/div>\n
SC Judgement on HMA24 – Wife working no maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
9. HIGH COURT OF P & H <\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance awarded in two sections to be offset<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
10. HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD <\/span><\/div>\n
Old Parents, Maintenance reduced. <\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
11. MUMBAI HIGH COURT: Dated 22 February, 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
Perjury in 125 crPc<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
12. MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT: Madhuri Bai vs Minor Surendra Kumar And Anr. on 24 April, 1998 <\/span><\/div>\n
Child can claim maintenance u\/s 125 from mother<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
13. MADRAS HIGH COURT: S.Chandra vs C.V.Sridharan on 21 February 2007<\/span><\/div>\n
Claim alimony within 6 Months of Divorce<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
14. DELHI HIGH COURT: Sanjay Bhardwaj & Ors. vs The State & Anr. on 27 August, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Unemployed man can not be forced to pay Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
15. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Ines Miranda vs Santosh K Swamy dated 14 december 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
TRANSFER PETITION \u2013 Payment to Husband<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
16. MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated  17 July, 1991 <\/span><\/div>\n
Same relief (maintenance)cannot be asked twice in two different courts<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
17. DELHI COURT : METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NEW DELHI <\/span><\/div>\n
Vexatious petition, maintenance,relief is declined<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
18. BOMBAY HIGH COURT :  Dated 14 March 2011<\/span><\/div>\n
Perjury Judgement : Rigorous imprisonment for False Case<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
19. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (CENTRAL)TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI: Dated  15 April 2011<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance claim based on Affidavit dismissed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
20. PUNJAB – HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated  17 February 2011<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance claim based on Affidavit dismissed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
21. DELHI HIGH COURT <\/span><\/div>\n
Husband Property Not Counted in Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
22.  HIGH COURT OF P & H :  Dated 28 July 1961<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance not based on Arthmetic Calculation<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
23. DELHI HIGH COURT  : Dated 1 September, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Claim of high status of husband not sufficient for interim maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
24.  DELHI HIGH COURT  : Dated 30 August, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Multiple Maintenance petitions are not allowed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
25. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Reduced Intrim Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
26.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  11 June, 1993 <\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
27. MUMBAI HIGH COURT :  Dated  18 July, 2009<\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance to Wife if RCR By Husband Suicceed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
28. MUMBAI HIGH COURT <\/span><\/div>\n
Permanent Alimoney Cancelled.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
29. MUMBAI HIGH COURRT: Dated 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Income Tax and Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
30. MUMBAI HIGH COURRT: Dated 18 November 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Income tax returns cannt decide Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
31. MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT: Dated 29 August 1991<\/span><\/div>\n
Challenging the rejected interim maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
32. PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated 25 January, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
False affidavit, perjury procedure in 24 HMA<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
33. DELHI HIGH COURT  : Dated 7 September 2006<\/span><\/div>\n
Divorce withdrawn \u2013 Maintance to be paid<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
34. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 16 November 2004<\/span><\/div>\n
Father In Law not responsible for Residence<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
35. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: Dated 22 September, 1992 <\/span><\/div>\n
Women to Prove ligitimacy of child for maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
36. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION<\/span><\/div>\n
Bank Account Details and confidentiality<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
37. BOMBAY HIGH COURT: Dated  15 September, 2004 <\/span><\/div>\n
Return of Stridhan,Alimony and Hidding Past<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
38. GAUHATI HIGH COURT: Dated  23 April, 2004 <\/span><\/div>\n
Guardianship within 2 Months<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
39. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  9 March, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Fine for Delaying tactics by Lawyer<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
40. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION <\/span><\/div>\n
Central Information Commission – CIC Order in Passport Details<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

41. UTTARANCHAL HIGH COURT : Dated25 October 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance u\/s125Crpc for working Women<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
42. UTTARANCHAL HIGH COURT :  Dated  18November,2009<\/span><\/div>\n
No Maintenance u\/s Crpc 125 if wife deserts husband<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
43. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated  22 September, 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Maintenance formula evolved by judges for wife and child \u2013 PWDVA<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
44. MADRAS HIGH COURT: Dated  20 November 2006<\/span><\/div>\n
Mother is not always right person for custody<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
45. SUPREME COURT: Dated 2 March 2001<\/span><\/div>\n
Rules for Child Custody<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
46. SUPREME COURT: Dated  23 March 2004<\/span><\/div>\n
Illegitimacy of child is not with Family court<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
47. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated  10 September 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
No maintenance to Capable wife<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
48. MADRAS HIGH COURT: Dated  4 November 2006<\/span><\/div>\n
Husband has to prove his Earning<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
49. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Dated  5 June 2007<\/span><\/div>\n
Section 125 Cr.P.C.Proceedings under are civil in nature.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
50. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  15 December, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Wife has no Right on Monther in Law’s Property<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
51. KERALA HIGH COURT : Dated 10 December, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Kerla HC accepts the easy misuse of DV<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
52. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Dated  9 November, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Double jeopardy applies to same offence, not same facts<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
53. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  29 July, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Family members of NRI husband cannot be accused in DV case<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
54. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  18 September, 2008 <\/span><\/div>\n
No maintenance to earning spouse<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
55. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated  10 January, 2003 <\/span><\/div>\n
Alimony can be granted even to an erring spouse<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
56.PUNJAB-HARYANA HIGH COURT : Dated  23 September, 2009 <\/span><\/div>\n
False case and Damage<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
57. ROHINI COURT – DELHI<\/span><\/div>\n
False Dv and Women Failed to Prove it<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
58. ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE NEW DELHI <\/span><\/div>\n
Domestic Violence to be Proved<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
59. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION<\/span><\/div>\n
3rd Party Passport Details are Allowed<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
60. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  4 November, 1997 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus for Custody and Visitation<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
61. DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated  25 October, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
Petitioner must claim she is unable to maintain herself for <\/a><\/span>relief of maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
62. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated  25 March, 1976 <\/span><\/div>\n
Petitioner must claim she is unable to maintain herself for <\/a><\/span>relief of maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
63. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 13 February, 1980 <\/span><\/div>\n
She should prove that she is unable to maintain <\/a><\/span>herself in addition to the facts that her husband has sufficient means<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
to maintain her and that he has neglected to maintain her<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
64. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated  22 August, 2005 <\/span><\/div>\n
No maintenance for earning wife<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
65. DISTRICT COURT , SAKET, DELHI : Dated  18 Nov 2010<\/span><\/div>\n
Employable wife not entitled to maintenance.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
66. DISTRICT COURT , SAKET, DELHI : Dated 24 March 2008<\/span><\/div>\n
An NRI wins an interim maintenance case<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
67. FAMILY COURT , HYDERABAD<\/span><\/div>\n
Hyderabad Family court, unclean hands, no maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
68. DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated  17 April 2007<\/span><\/div>\n
Conditions when maintenance to be paid<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
69. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  11 January, 2011 <\/span><\/div>\n
All State Amendments in Sec. 125 are invalid<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
70. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 17 February, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus for girl child custody to Father<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
71. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 28 April, 2005 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus dismissed in Custody Appeal<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
72. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  21 November, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Custody to reMarried women<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
73. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 25 January, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus on Custody to Father<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
74. MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 6 February, 2006 <\/span><\/div>\n
Habeas Corpus for Custody on Death<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
75. KERALA HIGH COURT : Dated  December, 2010 <\/span><\/div>\n
NBW cannot be issued for non payment of maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
76. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION <\/span><\/div>\n
CIC \u2013 Income Tax Details of FIL are public<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
77. UTTARANCHAl HIGH COURT : Dated  17 March, 2011 <\/span><\/div>\n
HC Quash Maintenance<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
78. MUMBAI HIGH COURT :Dated  13 September, 1995 <\/span><\/div>\n
No multiple maintenance claims<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
79. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated  9 October, 1985 <\/span><\/div>\n
Magistrate can grant interim maintenance ?<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t