{"id":462,"date":"2018-01-21T14:38:14","date_gmt":"2018-01-21T14:38:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/?p=462"},"modified":"2018-01-21T14:38:14","modified_gmt":"2018-01-21T14:38:14","slug":"vodafone-plea-against-trai-penalty-delhi-high-court-seeks-government-s-response","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/vodafone-plea-against-trai-penalty-delhi-high-court-seeks-government-s-response\/","title":{"rendered":"Vodafone Plea Against TRAI Penalty: Delhi High Court Seeks Government&#8217;s Response"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Source &#8211; <strong>gadgets.ndtv.com<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the government&#8217;s response on Vodafone&#8217;s plea against telecom regulator TRAI&#8217;s recommendation to\u00a0impose a Rs. 1,050 crores penalty\u00a0on it for not providing interconnectivity to Reliance Jio.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva also issued notice to the\u00a0Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)\u00a0and sought its reply to Vodafone&#8217;s plea alleging that despite the DoT asking it to reconsider its recommendation, it did not do so.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">The court listed the matter for hearing on July 19. Telecom major\u00a0Vodafone\u00a0told the court that the TRAI had first made the recommendation in October 21, 2016, following which it was sent back to the regulator by the\u00a0Department of Telecommunication (DoT)\u00a0for reconsideration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">However, the regulator on May 24 reiterated its earlier recommendation, the telecom major said and added that this decision was taken without hearing it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">It also claimed that while DoT was concurring with it, TRAI was taking a different stand. The court then asked why should there be a stay of the recommendation as the DoT was yet to take a final view on it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">In response to the query, Vodafone said that\u00a0Reliance Jio\u00a0had used the recommendation to lodge a complaint with the\u00a0Competition Commission of India (CCI)\u00a0alleging unfair trade practice by telecom majors, including Airtel and Idea.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">Vodafone, in its application, has also said that pursuant to the complaint, the CCI has reportedly initiated an investigation against it and the other telecom majors.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">The application has been filed by the telecom major in its main petition challenging the TRAI&#8217;s October 2016 recommendation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">TRAI had earlier told the court that it was not required to give a hearing to Vodafone before it gave its recommendation and admitted that no such hearing was given to the telecom major.<\/p>\n<p style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 20px; font-size: 16px; color: #3e433e; line-height: 24px; font-family: 'Open Sans', HelveticaNeue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; width: 770px;\">TRAI has recommended imposition of a fine of Rs. 50 crores for each of the 21 circles of Vodafone, except in Jammu and Kashmir, coming to a total of Rs. 1,050 crores.\u00a0Similar recommendations\u00a0were issued by the regulator against Airtel and Idea.<\/p>\n<div class=\"fb-background-color\">\n\t\t\t  <div \n\t\t\t  \tclass = \"fb-comments\" \n\t\t\t  \tdata-href = \"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/vodafone-plea-against-trai-penalty-delhi-high-court-seeks-government-s-response\/\"\n\t\t\t  \tdata-numposts = \"5\"\n\t\t\t  \tdata-lazy = \"true\"\n\t\t\t\tdata-colorscheme = \"light\"\n\t\t\t\tdata-order-by = \"social\"\n\t\t\t\tdata-mobile=true>\n\t\t\t  <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t  <style>\n\t\t    .fb-background-color {\n\t\t\t\tbackground:  !important;\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t.fb_iframe_widget_fluid_desktop iframe {\n\t\t\t    width: 100% !important;\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t  <\/style>\n\t\t  ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source &#8211; gadgets.ndtv.com The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the government&#8217;s response on Vodafone&#8217;s plea against telecom regulator TRAI&#8217;s recommendation to\u00a0impose a Rs. 1,050 crores penalty\u00a0on it for not providing interconnectivity to Reliance Jio. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva also issued notice to the\u00a0Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)\u00a0and sought its reply to Vodafone&#8217;s plea alleging [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1472,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[630,6,631,26,629],"class_list":["post-462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-against-trai-penalty","tag-delhi-high-court","tag-governments-response","tag-high-court","tag-vodafone-plea"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=462"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/462\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1474,"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/462\/revisions\/1474"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wakilsahab.in\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}