Source:barandbench.com The Delhi High Court has held that the claim of a mother under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 as the natural guardian of a minor cannot be used to decide the jurisdiction of the Family Court under Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The judgment was passed
Source:- timesofindia.indiatimes.com GURUGRAM: Guess what’s the biggest ‘crime’ in Gurugram? Forget the usual – chain snatching, carjacking, loot, rape, murder. It’s cheque bounce. In fact, the problem is so acute in this corporate hub that four of its 44 courts are solely dedicated to disposing of cheque bounce cases. At present, there are a total
Source:- huffingtonpost.in There seems to be no end in sight to the beef ban saga. Yet, there lies a silver lining in this cacophony. The drama that unfolded over the last few months has shown how Indians vehemently oppose and express their dissent against the government when they think it has gone awry. Even the outcry
Source:- dnaindia.com It is necessary for courts to take a “pragmatic view” of the rights of consumers in disputes concerning them since customers are at a disadvantage as compared to service providers, the Supreme Court has said. The court noted that Parliament had enacted the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and provision of limitation in the
Source – indiatimes.com NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ruled that judiciary is not the forum to decide what should be included or excluded from school syllabus or what should be taught in educational institutions. Refusing to entertain a PIL seeking inclusion of teachings of ten Sikh gurus in school curriculum, a bench of Justices
