Author: wakilsahab

“Unconstitutional’ Triple Talaq?: Here’s What the Supreme Court’s Judgement Actually Means

Source – thebetterindia.com On 22nd Aug 2017, the Supreme Court in a judgment being heralded as historic by many, held ‘instant triple talaq’ to be unconstitutional. While the judgment is being hailed, it is important to reiterate that only the ‘instant’ version of it – the utterance of talaq thrice in one sitting – has been

Arvind Kejriwal and AAP leader Ashutosh pulled up by Delhi High Court, says judge cannot be blamed for speedy trial

Source – financialexpress.com Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Ashutosh was pulled up by the Delhi High Court on Friday for filing a plea to set aside an order of a single judge, which had directed that the trial in the Rs 10 crore defamation suit filed by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley be conducted expeditiously, as per Indian Express

Supreme Court’s Lost Chance

Source – indianexpress.com On August 22, the Supreme Court delivered its judgement in a case challenging the constitutional validity of the practice of “instant triple talaq” by Muslim husbands. The case held significant opportunities for the Court. It was asked to decide if the practice violated the constitutional right to equality and protections against gender

Supreme Court refuses Bihar liquor manufacturers to take remaining stock outside state

Source – thehansindia.com New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to grant any relief to Bihar liquor manufacturers, who had knocked its doors seeking permission to take the remaining stock of liquor outside the state. The Bihar Government had told the Apex Court that approximately Rs 200 crore of old liquor stock was destroyed. Earlier on

Triple Talaq Judgment Upholds the Quran Within the Constitution of India

Source – thewire.in Thanks to the historic judgement of a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court declaring the practice of unilateral divorce (also known as triple talaq or talaq-e-biddat) unconstitutional, it is now unequivocally established that the practice  – which runs counter to the gender jurisprudence evolved by the Supreme Court, the principles of equality as ordained in the constitution, international human rights law and the Quran – is